SOLUSI PERDEBATAN TEOLOGIS MENGENAI KISAH GANDA PENCIPTAAN DALAM KITAB KEJADIAN
Keywords:
kejadian, penciptaan, perjanjian lama, kritik teks, genesis, creation, documentary hypothesis, old testament, text criticism, hipotesis dokumenAbstract
Abstrak
Kitab Kejadian 1 dan 2 menyajikan narasi tentang penciptaan yang berbeda dan sering dijadikan bahan untuk mempertanyakan kredibilitas Alkitab. Betulkah kedua narasi itu berasal dari dua sumber yang berbeda? Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjawab pertanyaan tersebut dengan menggunakan pendekatan epistemologis, teori documentary hypotesis serta kritik teks dan sumber terhadap narasi tekstual Kejadian 1 dan 2. Diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa kedua teks sekalipun berbeda isi, komposisi dan gaya, tetapi menyajikan pesan teologis yang menyatu dan tidak saling bertentangan.
Abstract
The books of Genesis 1 and 2 present different narratives of creation and are often used as material to question the credibility of the Bible. Is it true that the two narratives come from two different sources? This research aims to answer this question by using an epistemological approach, documentary hypothesis theory as well as text and source criticism of the textual narratives of Genesis 1 and 2. The conclusion is that even though the two texts are different in content, composition and style, they present a theological message that is unified and not mutually exclusive. contradictory.
References
Archer, Gleason R. Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties. Grand Rapids Michigan: Zondervan, 1982.
Bahnsen, Greg L. “The Innerancy of the Autographa.” In Innerancy, edited by Norman L. Geisler, 151–196. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1980.
Baker, Joy Don. “The Purpose, Process, and Methods of Writing a Literature Review.” AORN Journal 103, no. 3 (2016): 265–269.
Barton, John, and John Muddiman, eds. The Pentateuch - The Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Berman, Joshua A. Inconsistency in the Torah: Ancient Literary Convention and the Limits of Source Criticism. Inconsistency in the Torah: Ancient Literary Convention and the Limits of Source Criticism. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press, 2017.
Blommendaal, J. Pengantar Kepada Perjanjian Lama. 15th ed. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 2008.
Boland, Richard J., Mike Newman, and Brian T. Pentland. “Hermeneutical Exegesis in Information Systems Design and Use.” Information and Organization 20, no. 1 (2010): 1–20.
Brock, Darrell L., and Daniel B. Wallace. Mendongkel Yesus Dari TahtaNya - Upaya Mutakhir Untuk Menjungkirbalikkan Iman Gereja Mengenai Yesus Kristus [Dethroning Jesus: Exposing Popular Culture’s Quest to Unseat the Biblical Christ]. Edited by Helda Siahaan. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2009.
Coogan, Michael D., ed. THE NEW OXFORD ANNOTATED BIBLE New Revised Standard Version With The Apocrypha. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
CS University of Maryland. “A List of over 700 Inconsistencies in the Bible.” University of Maryland.
Elliott, J. K., and Bruce M. Metzger. “The Text of the New Testament. Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration.” Novum Testamentum 36, no. 1 (1994): 97.
Evans, C. Stephen. “Faith and Revelation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion, 2007.
Funk, Robert W., Roy W. Hoover, and The Jesus Seminar. The Five Gospel: What Did Jesus Really Says? The Search for the Authentic Words of Jesus. Edited by HarperSanFransisco. San Fransisco, 1992.
Hamilton, Victor P. Handbook on the Pentateuch. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic, 2008.
Hayes, John H., and Carl R. Holladay. Pedoman Penafsiran Alkitab [Guidelines for the Bible Interpretation]. Edited by Iohanes Rakhmat. 6th ed. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 2006.
Holmes, Michael W. “A Student’s Guide to Textual Criticism of the Bible: Its History, Methods, and Results ? Paul D. Wegner.” Religious Studies Review 32, no. 4 (2006): 264–264.
Hum, Yan Chai. “Literature Reviews.” In Springer Verlag, 11–45, 2013.
Ichikawa, Jonathan Jenkins. “Faith and Epistemology.” Episteme, no. 2018 (2018): 1–20.
Jatmiko, Yudi. “Konsep Otoritas Alkitab Di Hadapan Fakta Kesalahan Tekstual: Sebuah Diskusi Teologis [The Concept of Biblical Authority in the Facts of Textual Errors: A Theological Discussion].” Veritas : Jurnal Teologi dan Pelayanan 16, no. 1 (2017): 1–16.
Knust, Jennifer Wright. “In Pursuit of a Singular Text: New Testament Textual Criticism and the Desire for the True Original.” Religion Compass 2, no. 2 (March 2008): 180–194.
Lawrence, Paul. Atlas Dan Sejarah Alkitab. Jakarta: Bpk Gunung Mulia, 2016.
Mason, R. “Truth, Beauty, and Goodness in Biblical Narratives: A Hermeneutical Study of Genesis 21:1-21. By KRZYSZTOF SONEK.” The Journal of Theological Studies 61, no. 1 (April 2010): 241–244.
McDonald, Lee M. “Where Lies Authority? A Discussion of Books, Texts, and Translations.” In Exploring the Origins of the Bible: Canon Formation in Historical, Literary, and Theological Perspective, edited by Craig A. Evans and Emanuel Tov, 203–253. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic, 2008.
News24. “The Problem of the Bible: Inaccuracies, Contradictions, Fallacies, Scientific Issues and More.” News24.
Nobel, Paul R. “Synchronic and Diachronic Approaches to Biblical Interpretation.” Literature and Theology 7, no. 2 (1993): 130–148.
O’Collins, Gerald. “General and Special Revelation.” Rethinking Fundamental Theology (2011): 56–95.
RC. Sproul. Kebenaran-Kebenaran Iman Kristen [The Truths of the Christian Faith]. Malang: Seminari Alkitab Asia Tenggara, 1997.
Römer, Thomas. “Zwischen Urkunden, Fragmenten Und Ergänzungen: Zum Stand Der Pentateuchforschung.” Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 125, no. 1 (January 2013).
Rooker, Mark F. “Genesis 1 : 1-3 : Creation or Re-Creation ?” Theology 149 (1992): 94–98.
Schnittjer, Gary Edward. The Torah Story. Edited by Emma Maspaitella. 1st ed. Malang: Gandum Mas, 2015.
Seters, John Van. The Pentateuch: Social Science Commentary. England: Sheffield Academic Press, 1999.
Sitompul, A.A., and Ulrich Beyer. Metode Penafsiran Alkitab [Methods for the Bible Interpretation]. 14th ed. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 2009.
Soulen, Richard N., and R. Kendall Soulen. Handbook of Biblical Criticism. Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001.
Sunarto. “Ineransi Alkitab Dan Implikasinya Bagi Kehidupan Orang-Orang Percaya.” TE DEUM (Jurnal Teologi dan Pengembangan Pelayanan) 2, no. 1 (April 2021): 347–361.
Swinburne, Richard. “Revelation.” In Our Knowledge of God, 115–130. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1992.
WEGNER, PAUL D. “Current Trends in Old Testament Textual Criticism.” Bulletin for Biblical Research 23, no. 4 (2013): 461–480.
Whybray, R. N. INTRODUCTION to the PENTATEUCH. Grand Rapids Michigan: William B Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1995.
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. “Crossing the Threshold of Divine Revelation.” Faith and Philosophy 28, no. 1 (2011): 102–108.
Zaluchu, Sonny Eli. “Metode Penelitian Di Dalam Manuskrip Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan.” Jurnal Teologi Berita Hidup 3, no. 2 (2021): 249–266.
———. Pentateuch - Narasi Narasi Utama Kitab Musa. 1st ed. Semarang: Golden Gate Publishing, 2020.
———. Teologi Dan Kristologi Kontemporer, 2022.
“The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy.” The Evangelical Theological Society.
